Pericles Net Worth

Pericles was a prominent Greek statesman, orator, patron of the arts, politician, and general of Athens who lived from 495–429 B.C. He was so influential that he was referred to as the "First Citizen" of democratic Athens and his era is known as the 'Age of Pericles' or the 'Golden Age of Athens'. He encouraged the flourishing of arts, literature, philosophy and freedom of expression, making Athens the hub of art, culture, education, and democracy. During this period, Hippocrates practiced medicine, sculptors like Phidias and Myron created statues, playwrights like Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, and Aristophanes invented the modern-day theatre, and philosophers like Protagoras, Zeno of Elea, and Anaxagoras were all his close friends. The Acropolis and the Parthenon were also built during this time. After his death, the golden age of Athens eventually slipped away.
Pericles is a member of Leaders

Age, Biography and Wiki

Who is it? First Citizen of Democratic Athens
Birth Place Athens, Greek
Died On 429 BC\nAthens, Greece
Allegiance Athens
Rank General (Strategos)
Battles/wars Battle in Sicyon and Acarnania (454 BC) Second Sacred War (448 BC) Expulsion of barbarians from Gallipoli (447 BC) Samian War (440 BC) Siege of Byzantium (438 BC) Peloponnesian War (431–429 BC)

💰 Net worth

Pericles, often referred to as the First Citizen of Democratic Athens in Greek, is a historical figure whose wealth is estimated to range between $100K to $1M in the year 2024. Recognized for his significant contributions to the governance and development of Athens during its Golden Age, Pericles' net worth underscores his prominence and influence in society. As a statesman and orator, he played a pivotal role in shaping democratic principles, promoting cultural achievements, and fortifying the city-state's power and influence. Pericles remains an enduring symbol of Athenian democracy and the progressive ideals he championed.

Some Pericles images

Biography/Timeline

2013

In any case, seeing the pillage of their farms, the Athenians were outraged, and they soon began to indirectly express their discontent towards their leader, who many of them considered to have drawn them into the war. Even when in the face of mounting pressure, Pericles did not give in to the demands for immediate action against the enemy or revise his initial strategy. He also avoided convening the ecclesia, fearing that the populace, outraged by the unopposed ravaging of their farms, might rashly decide to challenge the vaunted Spartan army in the field. As meetings of the assembly were called at the discretion of its rotating Presidents, the "prytanies", Pericles had no formal control over their scheduling; rather, the respect in which Pericles was held by the prytanies was apparently sufficient to persuade them to do as he wished. While the Spartan army remained in Attica, Pericles sent a fleet of 100 ships to loot the coasts of the Peloponnese and charged the cavalry to guard the ravaged farms close to the walls of the city. When the enemy retired and the pillaging came to an end, Pericles proposed a decree according to which the authorities of the city should put aside 1,000 talents and 100 ships, in case Athens was attacked by naval forces. According to the most stringent provision of the decree, even proposing a different use of the money or ships would entail the penalty of death. During the autumn of 431 BC, Pericles led the Athenian forces that invaded Megara and a few months later (winter of 431–430 BC) he delivered his monumental and emotional Funeral Oration, honoring the Athenians who died for their city.

2019

Ioannis Kakridis and Arnold Gomme were two scholars who debated the originality of Pericles’ oratory and last speech. Kakridis believes that Thucydides altered Pericles words. Some of his strongest arguments included in the Introduction of the speech, (Thuc.11.35). Kakridis proposes that it is impossible to imagine Pericles deviating away from the expected funeral orator addressing the mourning audience of 430 after the Peloponnesian war. The two groups addressed were the ones who were prepared to believe him when he praised the dead, and the ones who did not. Gomme rejects Kakridis position, defending the fact that "Nobody of men has ever been so conscious of envy and its workings as the Greeks, and that the Greeks and Thucydides in particular had a passion for covering all ground in their generalizations, not always relevantly.".